Cit v. ahmedabad urban development authority
WebThe 74th Amendment to the Indian Constitution defines a metropolitan area as: An area having a population of 10 Lakh or 1 Million or more, comprised in one or more districts and consisting of two or more Municipalities or Panchayats or other contiguous areas, specified by the Governor by public notification to be a Metropolitan area. [1] [2] List WebNov 5, 2024 · Case Details: ACIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority - [2024] 144 taxmann.com 78 (SC) Judiciary and Counsel Details. Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI, S. Ravindra Bhat & Pamidighantam Sri …
Cit v. ahmedabad urban development authority
Did you know?
WebKindly pay a visit to http://ecourts.gov.in for latest Case Status, Order/Judgment, Cause List of District Courts, Gujarat Judiciary. Kindly pay a visit to Judges ... WebOct 31, 2024 · Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority [Civil Appeal No. 21762 of 2024]. M/s New Noble Educational …
WebApr 13, 2024 · CIT(A). The first appellate authority cannot dismiss assessee’s appeal in limine for non- prosecution without deciding the appeal on merits through an order in … WebAug 13, 2024 · CIT (A) deleted the penalty on the ground that assessee has succeeded before the Gujarat High Court in quantum additions. Same was the view expressed by …
WebAhmedabad Urban Development Authority v. DDIT(Ex.) 335 ITR 575 (Guj) - Effect of registration of trust ... CIT v. Baroda Industrial Development Corp 24 Taxman 36 (Guj) and CIT v. Ganga Charity Trust Fund, 162 ITR 612 (Guj) - Income tax and wealth tax paid to be deducted in computing the income of the trust. 2. DIT v. National Association of ... WebIn Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Balbir Singh [2004(5) SCC 65] it was inter alia observed as follows: 8. However, the power and duty to award compensation does not …
WebJun 25, 2024 · Learned CIT, D.R., at the outset, invited our attention to the petitions for condonation of delay in filing the Cross Objections and submitted that the Cross Objections filed by the Revenue are belated by 51 days and 53 days respectively and which has happened due to pressure of work on the Revenue.
WebJul 13, 2024 · CIT v Agra Development Authority [2024] 106 taxmann.com 111 (SC)] 5. SLP filed against High Court’s order allowing assessee’s application for stay subject to payment of 10 per cent of tax demand, was to be dismissed. [Popular Traders v Asst. CIT [2024] 106 taxmann.com 89 (SC)] 6. greencore derbyshireWebThe Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority is a civilian government body responsible for overseeing and sanctioning construction and infrastructure development across the … greencore deliveryWebWelcome to Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (AUDA) With a staff of only 250 people, AUDA is lean Organization, Planning and Regulating development in an … flow tracer altairWebNov 4, 2024 · [CIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1461, decided on 19.10.2024] *Judgment by: Justice S. Ravindra Bhat Tweet Tags : cess charitable institution Charitable purpose fees General Public Utility Income Tax legislative intent Section 2 (15) of Income Tax Act Tax Exemption Leave a comment flow to 意味WebCIT(A)-7, Ahmedabad dated 06.11.2024 pertaining to A.Y. 2014-15 and that ... reply from Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority(AUDA) has been received vide Ref. No. : No. 15287 dated 16.11.2016. In its reply, it has been submitted by the Sr. Town Planner, AUDA, Ahmedabad that the "the Minimum Distance of revenue limit of the village ... greencore distributionWebAccountant and developer accepted in the statement recorded that they have collected on money from flat purchasers. Developer went to settlement commission and also submitted about on money as source . Assessing Officer has issued notice u/sec. 153C for 6 years to assessee on this information. flowtracer edaWebCIT v. Morgan Stanley Mauritius Co. Ltd. (2024) 413 ITR 332 / 308 CTR 139 / 176 DTR 413 (Bom.) (HC) S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)–Powers-Deduction at source- TDS return- There is no power conferred on authority to declare a TDS return as non-est exposing assessee to consequences thereof. [S. 200 (3), 234E] Manoj Kumar Jaiswal v. greencore dordon tamworth